I’ve started to think that I want to pursue follklore and textuality as an academic interest, combining that pursuit with a related interest: orality and literacy. I’m taking Barry Pearson’s class ENGL629A Readings in Folklore and Folklife, and while I’m interested in the stories, I’m mostly interested in how these stories come to be represented to the general public. For example, in the case of Zora Neale Hurston and her work for the WPA (nice segue to grandpa’s log below)–what the heck was going on? Who had influence on how she collected and how she presented it? The Library of Congress? Franz Boas, her Columbia anthropology mentor? How about the Lippincott company who published her book Mules and Men?
While I find these questions interesting, the thought of actually going out and collecting folklore sounds daunting. It feels like a violation in some respects, like that horrible feeling of going door-to-door selling candles for the swim team or thin mints and do-see-dohs (sp?) for the good ole Scouts of Girls. How much theory would you have to muddle through and contemplate all the time to not feel like you are (a) taking advantage of someone else for your own perceptions of “good stuff” and “what the world needs to hear/know” and (b) misrepresenting that “good stuff” for the same reasons? Too complicated for me. I’ll stick to collecting family stories and leave that field work out there for the braver team members. Then, I could come in and critique what these outfielders have caught and how they tally the stats.
Collecting folklore sounds as frightening to the introvert as teaching English 101 for the first time . . . wait a minute . . .
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Library & Information Science- A Grad Option for Professional Writing Students – Sydnei Wheat on Joint Degrees in Library and Information Science and English, History, and Arts
- Information and Library Science: A Grad Option for Professional Writing Students – UAB MEMORANDUM on Joint Degrees in Library and Information Science and English, History, and Arts
- tjowens on Class on Fieldwork in Digital Humanities
- mcburton on Class on Fieldwork in Digital Humanities
- StanfordArcade on Class on Fieldwork in Digital Humanities
Archives
- July 2019
- June 2019
- October 2015
- September 2015
- January 2015
- May 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- March 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- March 2012
- January 2012
- October 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- July 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- October 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- November 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
Categories
Meta
these questions are so tricky. and so great. i think folklorists are in the oddest of positions as “social scientists” because they are wise to leave at least some of the analysis up to the folk from whom they collect. and that’s why hurston’s work is so complicated; she purchases much strength from her ability to be part of the community in which she’s working, while she obviously comes from other communities. i’ve had students really pissed off at her for abusing the faith of her informants in the hoodoo section of mules and men, but i think she knows how to be a good trickster.
the collecting folklorist and the collected-from folk are cooperating parties, because both get to theorize the value of the folklore. informants are generally happy to tell the folklorist what they think about the meaning of the lore. fieldworkers who “explain” their informants from above seem to fall short. i think the folk’s “good stuff” IS “what the world needs to hear/know.”
probably this is all stuff that blp will say in his readings course… thanks for a thoughtful post about folklore work, though.