Summit on Digital Tools for the Humanities–Day Two

Wow. That’s a lot for one day. This is a break down of the major points of interest. I won’t parcel these out into tools because a single tool might incorporate many of these attributes.
Major points of need that came up:
*collaboration (within and across projects),
*basic tools that do “basic” scholarly primitives *
*institutional structures [tenure, peer-review, repostitory so that *projects aren’t duplicated],
*continued open source
*participation, “training” courses are not a good idea-people need to be invested in what they are doing; the U.S. needs a system like EPOCH as a repository for differnt tools and projects.
*richer data;
*standards and documentaion (or tools that switch across different formats);
Simplify tools–low threshhold, high ceiling; easy to play but very sophisticated for knowledge production; we need teams that collaborate and provide training;
*A tool wiki (isn’t this like Tapor?) where you can go to get documentation and to get the tool.
*Multiplayer gaming environment to facilitate different perspectives and engaging with the tool;
*Record keeping; processing that data for documentation.
Knowledge brokering system that allows us to tap into the various domains; a way of defining our
functional requirements in an open way, a team driven process.
Limits: immense cost in dollars and time in creating data; these environments require rich data.
research methods: reading, finding/discovering/seraching; comparison; interpretation; interrelating and interreferencing; self-reflection; collection building; collecting data; selection/exclusion; filtering;authenticity analysis; evaluation; copus statistics; analysis; modeling/representation; classification/ontologies; statistical analysis; geographic spatial coordinating; visualization; temporal coordination; chaos; ordering/arranging; patter recognition/representation; conjecture; serendipity;
challenge: developing new methods; defining research; research methods vs. dig res. methods;
defining canonical list of methods not possible w/out tech.; facilitating the development of new
methods; improving effectiveness and efficiency of existing methods (traditional methods and digial
methods); ambiguity/uncertainty representation;
classification tools; collaboration; simulation; method standards; data modeling; encourage
collaboration (all scholars with all scholars); methodology [teaching methodology (self
reflection); applying methodology; methods should inform tools];
Question of the day:
If we’re on an island and they’re not coming to get us, what would we want to reproduce and what not? What would be intellectually rewarding?

This entry was posted in Tools. Bookmark the permalink.